The article by Artie Fufkin yesterday has raised many comments.
Some are in the messageboard, but others were sent direct to the editor via email.
Below are the responses so far.
Feel free to add your comments in the messageboard.
Here we go...
The ''Artie Fufkin'' article about New Anfield emphasises to
me your all besotted with football life north of Watford Gap...
For any Chelsea fan to crib on about money and in the same article mention
the words Begging-Bowl and Tawdry in light of the history of Ken Bates and
Roman''s patronage is laughable...
I have good mates who are Chelsea fans ...This bile-filled myopic crap
does them and your recently-successful football club a disservice.
Anfield Plaza anyone?
Looks like it''s happening Artie ''old bean''!
You want to be wary of obsession. It can eat away at you!!!
Also:
Scousers love their history, so here''s a lesson from it:
unlike Chelsea, Liverpool FC have never built their own stadium - they
took over Anfield from Everton - and it looks like they never will.
Lads, would you please ensure that you get your facts right when slagging
off other clubs? Chelsea have never built their own stadium either. In
fact, only for Fulham decided to leave Stamford Bridge there may not ever
have been a Chelsea FC as we know it.
And:
With regard to the article
Liverpool FC stadium - special.
This article is pure rubbish. If you can''t supply facts to back up your
accusations, then don''t write articles suggesting clubs are corrupt.
Liverpool are trying to secure the best financial deal for a new stadium
hence their involvement with funding from various sources. Might I add
Stamford Bridge is not a new stadium but a development of the old run down
70''s tin sheds that surrounded the pitch. I think the author needs to get
his facts straight
Finally - for now...
RE:Stanley park stadium article
Far far too many misconconceptions, misrepresentations and hypocrisies
within your piece to warrant a fraction of the time it would take to
correct them.
I would say, however, your preoccupation with LFC is frankly alarming.
Stalkers have been sectioned for less. Would suggest you see a therapist
PDQ. Either that or try some dope.
PS - For the record your piece appeared on LFC''s Newsnow which is how I
came to have the misfortune to read it. It so happens am not a stalker of
anyone or anything least of all Chelsea FC.